Assertion Labs / Advisory
Make consequential decisions reconstructable.
Design evidence lineage and decision records so a team can explain which source, policy and approval supported an action, and what changed afterward.
Discuss an evidence workflow →Context
Engineering and security teams whose automated workflows cannot reliably reconstruct a decision or distinguish current evidence from superseded material.
Preparation & access
A workflow diagram, representative redacted decision logs, source-version conventions and retention requirements. Share only authorized artifacts through an agreed channel after scoping.
Work & deliverables
- An inventory of evidence sources and lineage gaps
- A proposed decision-record schema and retention boundaries
- A bounded instrumentation prototype or implementation plan, as agreed
- Verification scenarios for changed, missing and contradictory evidence
Scope & limitations
Implementation is limited to the agreed workflow. No compliance attestation, legal retention advice or guarantee of complete historical reconstruction. CliqueMap use is evaluated separately; it is not a prerequisite.
Offered subject to fit, conflict review and availability. A conversation is not acceptance of an engagement.
How we work
Begin with a bounded question.
- Define the decision, boundaries, conflicts and available evidence.
- Agree on the work, deliverables, access and review process.
- Examine claims and record findings with their limitations.
- Discuss implications and the next decision.