Assertion Labs / Advisory

Better questions about AI and software risk.

Clear technical context for consequential decisions. Focused preparation, a concise written brief, and a discussion of the questions management should be able to answer.

Discuss a briefing →

Context

Executives, directors and technical leaders evaluating AI authority, software risk or a consequential technology choice.

Preparation & access

A short preparation discussion and agreed public or authorized materials. Scope, audience and schedule are agreed in advance.

Work & deliverables

  • Issue framing and the decision at hand
  • Assumptions, dependencies and evidence gaps
  • Practical management questions
  • A written decision brief, discussion and unresolved questions

Scope & limitations

Technical advice, not a statutory board appointment, legal opinion, external audit or certification.

Offered subject to fit, conflict review and availability. A conversation is not acceptance of an engagement.

Related writing and research →

How we work

Begin with a bounded question.

  1. Define the decision, boundaries, conflicts and available evidence.
  2. Agree on the work, deliverables, access and review process.
  3. Examine claims and record findings with their limitations.
  4. Discuss implications and the next decision.