Assertion Labs / Advisory

Separate the technical claim from its evidence.

Examine a product’s architecture, security claims and technical assumptions before a consequential investment, acquisition or product decision.

Scope a technical review →

Context

Investors, founders and acquirers who need to distinguish demonstrated capability from an attractive explanation.

Preparation & access

Public materials support initial scoping. Nonpublic materials require conflict clearance, authorization and agreed handling terms before transfer.

Work & deliverables

  • Claims and supporting evidence table
  • Architecture and deployment boundaries
  • Findings, source references and uncertainties
  • A technical memorandum and optional readout

Scope & limitations

No investment recommendation, valuation, audit opinion or certification. No penetration testing or production access without a separate authorized scope.

Offered subject to fit, conflict review and availability. A conversation is not acceptance of an engagement.

Related writing and research →

How we work

Begin with a bounded question.

  1. Define the decision, boundaries, conflicts and available evidence.
  2. Agree on the work, deliverables, access and review process.
  3. Examine claims and record findings with their limitations.
  4. Discuss implications and the next decision.